Albuquerque Divorce Lawyer Blog

In the recent case of Vescio v. Wolf, the New Mexico Court of Appeals discussed the issue of third-party child custody, which refers to a situation in which a person other than a child's mother or father seeks custody of that child. In Vescio, a child's aunt filed a petition for custody and timesharing against the child's mother and grandmother, who had been appointed the kinship guardian of the child (the child's father was not involved with the child's life or this case).

The aunt initially based her petition on alleged abuse of the child by the mother and grandmother, however, the New Mexico Children Youth and Families Department (CYFD) found the allegations of abuse to be unsubstantiated. The district court dismissed the aunt's petition because she lacked standing to seek custody under the regular child custody statutes.

In the Vescio opinion, the Court of Appeals listed five primary situations in which a third-party may be awarded child custody in New Mexico: 1) when extraordinary circumstances exist and there is no other adequate remedy available; 2) during an action for dissolution of marriage; 3) when a parent or guardian for the child dies, the court can award custody to a third-party under the Probate Code; 4) when there has been a finding of abuse and neglect by CYFD; and 5) when a third-party files a petition for custody under the Kinship Guardianship Act.

The Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of the aunt's petition because it did not properly fall within any of the situations listed above. However, the Court ruled that the aunt would have standing to file a motion to revoke the grandmother's guardianship under the Kinship Guardianship Act.

If you are a third-party thinking about seeking custody of a child, this case illustrates that importance of consulting with an attorney in order to ensure that you use the proper body of law as a basis for your claim.

www.CollinsAttorneys.com

Unfortunately, there comes a time in the lives of many adults when they are impaired to the point where they can no longer make decisions for themselves. This impairment can be the result of mental illness, physical disability or drug and alcohol abuse. In such situations, the New Mexico Probate Code Adult Guardianship provisions allows for the appointment of a guardian and/or a conservator to make important decisions for the impaired person. A guardian makes personal and health care decisions for the impaired person, which a conservator makes decisions related to the financial affairs and property of the impaired person.

Any person over the age of eighteen, or properly registered corporation, may serve as a guardian or conservator and the same person or entity does not have to serve as both guardian and conservator. For instance, often the spouse of an incapacitated person will be appointed as their guardian, but a bank will be appointed as conservator. Every guardian and conservator must be appointed to serve by the District Court.

While any party interested in the estate, affairs or welfare of an incapacitated person may file a petition to be appointed as guardian or conservator, the process is very complicated. The courts take these appointments very seriously because by appointing a guardian or conservator, the court is essentially taking away the fundamental right of the impaired person to make decisions for themselves. The incapacitated person and certain family members must be given notice of the appointment proceeding and the court will appoint a guardian ad litem to represent and protect he incapacitated person.

The court will also appoint a court visitor, which is usually a health care professional or social worker, and a qualified health care professional to evaluate whether or not the person is actually incapacitated to the extent that a guardian or conservator is necessary.

To further complicate things, a guardian or conservator can also be given limited guardianship authority, if the court believes that the person is only partially incapacitated and is still capable of making some decisions for his or herself. Given the wide variety of issues involved in the appointment of a guardian or conservator, it is a good idea to consult an attorney about the process if you believe that family member or loved one is in need of such supervision.

www.CollinsAttorneys.com

Just to make the community property versus separate property distinction even more complicated, sometimes the different types of property can be so intermingled that the property that was once separate becomes community or property that was community can become separate property (although this second example is very rare). This process of mixing property is often comingling or transmutation, which was described in a 1982 case from the Second Judicial Court in Albuquerque, called Allen v. Allen.

The most common way that property is comingled or transmuted is by gift. For instance, in the Allen case, the wife owned a piece of property prior to the marriage, which she later deeded to herself and her husband jointly. The Court ruled that the deed was evidence of the wife's intent to gift the property to the community, which changed the property from separate to community.

However, property can also be transmuted without a document specifically designating a gift, but rather through the actions of the parties. This situation commonly arises with a home owned by one spouse prior to the marriage. Under the basic rules of community property, the marital home would be the separate property of the spouse who owned the home prior to the marriage. However, what often happens is that the mortgage payments for that home are made from the parties' community funds (remember that all income earned during the marriage constitute community funds, even if the parties have separate bank accounts).

The donative intent of the spouse giving the separate property to the community is the key to evaluating whether or not the property was gifted. And without a document specifically identifying a gift, it can be very difficult to prove that intent. These cases may require hiring an outside expert to trace all of the funds applied toward the property, which can be a very expensive process. As with any divorce settlement process, the spouses arguing over possible transmuted property need to balance the value of the property in question against the potentially high cost of proving transmutation.

www.CollinsAttorneys.com

With few exceptions, the New Mexico Courts treat all debts incurred during a marriage, by either or both spouses, as community debt, which means that each spouse is equally responsible for the debt.

An important part of a divorce proceeding is a determination of which spouse will pay what debt after the spouses are divorced. After the spouses agree on, or the Court decides, who will pay each community debt, the Court enters a final order adopting that agreement or determination, which becomes binding on the spouses. However, that order is not binding on creditors that may be trying to collect payment of a community debt.

This limitation to the power of a divorce order is especially true when it comes to the Internal Revenue Service because a state court order is not binding on the federal government. During a marriage, when one or both spouses fail to pay federal taxes, the IRS has the power to collect those taxes for either or both spouses. The IRS may file a federal tax lien against any community property owned by the spouses, and is entitled to file a lien against any separate property owned by the debtor spouse. The IRS may choose to levy the wages or tax returns of either spouse.

Further, in New Mexico, the IRS can levy a spouse's 50% interest in community property for debts that were incurred before the marriage. The issue of federal taxes can severely complicate the property and debt division in a divorce proceeding. Spouses that are considering divorce and have outstanding tax issues should contact an attorney in order to avoid serious penalties.

www.CollinsAtttorneys.com

The general rule in the state of the New Mexico is that all debt incurred during a marriage becomes community debt, which means that both spouses are equally responsible for the debt. This is true even when one spouse creates a debt without the other spouse's knowledge, although there are some narrow exceptions to that rule.

Thus, as part of a divorce proceeding, both parties are required to identify all debts incurred during the marriage. Since these debts are most often community debt, the parties then need to decide how the debt will be divided between them. Essentially, each spouse is responsible for 50% of the debt unless the debt is divided pro rata based upon income, or some other way as agreed upon by the parties. The spouses (or their attorneys) must enter into a marital settlement agreement that identifies which spouse is going to take responsibility for which debt after the divorce is completed.

The parties' agreement with respect to the division of debt is then adopted by the Court in an order dissolving the marriage and adopting the Marital Settlement Agreement as an order of the court. The Second Judicial District Court in Albuquerque typically calls this order a Final Decree, but the name given by Courts around the state may vary. Whatever the title, the Court's final order is binding on the spouses and imposes a duty on each spouse to pay the debts that each agreed to pay.

However, problems often arise after a divorce is completed when one spouse quits paying a community debt that he or she agreed to pay as part of the divorce settlement. Even though the Final Decree is binding on divorcing parties, it is NOT binding on creditors seeking to collect a debt. This means that even after a divorce, a creditor may file an action against both spouses in an attempt to collect what was once a community debt. The collection is based upon joint and several liability for the community debt.

As a result, it is not infrequent that creditors go after one spouse for the debt assigned to the other in the Marital Settlement Agreement. Creditors are often extremely aggressive and unforgiving in their collection efforts. The law is unfortunately on their side. Any debt incurred during the marriage is arguably a community debt with respect to the parties. There are some exceptions such as gambling debts.

If you are considering divorce and have community debt, you should consider consulting an attorney to ensure that your marital settlement agreement clearly assigns that debt. And if you are being contacted by creditors for a debt assigned to your former spouse, you should contact an attorney immediately to discuss the enforcement of the order against your former spouse. Though you have few defenses against the creditor, you do have rights against your former spouse including orders of contempt, attorney fees and costs.

www.CollinsAttorneys.com

What should you do if a family member or friend has left their child with you for an extended period of time? In New Mexico, if a child has resided with you for an extended period of time and you want to continue to care for the child, you may be able acquire guardianship over the child through New Mexico's Kinship Guardianship Act.

Though there are numerous requirements under the Act, you do not have to be a blood relative in order to file a Kinship Guardianship petition. However, if you are not a relative, or a member of the child's tribe, you will have to demonstrate that you have a significant bond with the child. The grounds for guardianship, the bonds with the child, the bests interests of the child and other considerations must be set forth clearly in the Petition for Guardianship.

The Kinship Guardianship Act is meant to address situations in which a parent has left a child with another person for more than ninety (90) days without "appropriate care, guidance or supervision." If you are appointed the legal guardian of a child, the parent's rights are temporarily suspended and transferred to you. This also means that you are responsible for caring for the child as if he or she were your own, which not only means feeding and clothing the child, but making decisions about things like medical care and education for the child too.

The New Mexico Courts will only appoint a Kinship Guardian if that appointment is in the best interest of the child. If both of the child's parents agree to appointment of a legal guardian, then they can sign a Consent of Appointment of Guardian and they can also waive the requirement that a child live with you for at least ninety days before you can file a petition for kinship guardianship. However, if one or both of the child's parents dispute the guardianship, the Court must appoint a Guardian Ad Litem to represent the child's interest.

Once guardianship has been appointed, the legal guardian has full physical custody and financial responsibility for the care of the child. The financial burdens associated with custody of a child can be significant for a guardian. As such, the guardian can petition and the court will generally award child support from one or both parents for the care of their children while the guardianship is in effect.

www.CollinsAttorneys.com

A Guardian Ad Litem, often referred to as GAL, is a person appointed by the Court to represent the interests of a minor or a person who is unable to represent themselves by virtue of age or incompetence. In the case of child custody actions, the GAL is appointed to insure that the interests of the children are protected.

As in all child custody cases, the standard in New Mexico is the "best interests of the child." This is often hotly contested between the parties. In fact, if a GAL has been appointed, then the case probably has a very high level of conflict between the parties as to what is best for the children. Otherwise, there is no need for the GAL.

A GAL's job is to advocate zealously for their clients, which in this case is the children. The duty to represent the children is just as high as with any client. In high conflict child custody cases involving a GAL, the GAL can at times be overzealous often causing additional strain between the parties, and therefore on the child.

The GAL also acts as an investigative tool for the Court and, depending on the Court's order, may be charged with investigating the health care providers, teachers, coaches, counselors and others familiar with the child. As an arm of the court, what the GAL says goes. Therefore, if the parents cannot agree, the GAL decides and 9 times out of 10, the court will follow the advice of the GAL. This basically takes all the parenting decisions away from the parents where the parents cannot agree.

In New Mexico, a Judge may appoint a GAL in a wide variety of cases, including cases wherein a child has been a victim of abuse or neglect. Most often the GAL is appointed because the judge is fed up with the parties and the use of the GAL is the only option remaining for sorting out what is best for the children.

It is in your best interests and the best interests of your children to try to work with the other parent to work out a parenting plan without the intervention of a GAL. If a GAL is appointed, which we usually resist unless absolutely unavoidable, then you are in for a long, contentious, invasive and emotionally stressful ride. If that is not enough, the costs of the GAL will likely far exceed the costs of your attorney.

Do yourself, your children and your wallet a favor, work things out with the other parent. The GAL path is one you want to avoid at all costs. Once you have gone down that path, there is often very little left to salvage for you, your ex, or the children.

www.CollinsAttorneys.com

New Mexico law does not give a grandparent any automatic rights to custody over their grandchild. Instead, grandparents have the privilege of visitation with their grandchildren and that visitation may only be granted under certain specific instances, which are defined by statute in NMSA § 40-9-2.

Grandparents cannot interfere with the rights of legal parents, or force visitation with grandchildren upon unwilling parents, when a family is intact. However, a grandparent may petition the court for visitation as a part of any divorce proceeding, legal separation or paternity case involving their grandchild. A grandparent may also petition for visitation in the unfortunate event that their child (who is the parent of the grandchild) dies.

Finally, a grandparent may petition for visitation when the grandchild has lived primarily with the grandparent. If the grandchild is under the age of six, the grandparent can petition for visitation if the grandchild has resided with the grandparent for a period of three or more months. If this grandchild is over the age of six, then the grandchild must reside with the grandparent for a period of six or more months in order to support a grandparent's petition for visitation.

The Court will only grant a petition for grandparent visitation if it determines that such visitation is in the best interests of the grandchild. In determining the best interest of the grandchild, the Court will apply many of the same standards it uses to decide custody between two parents and may refer the parties for mediation or evaluation, especially in the Second Judicial District in Albuquerque and other jurisdictions that have a family court clinic specifically created to evaluate custody.

www.CollinsAttorneys.com

An order of protection is a type of restraining order issued to protect victims of domestic violence that is authorized by the Family Violence Protection Act. An Order of Protection basically prohibits contact between an alleged victim and the person the alleged abuser.

After an alleged victim of domestic violence (called the Protected Party) files a Petition alleging that another person (called the Restrained Party) has committed an act of domestic abuse, the court will issue a Temporary Order of Protection against the Restrained Party and order both parties to appear at a hearing.

The Temporary Order of Protection forbids the Restrained Party from any contact with the Protected Party until the hearing. This often means that a Restrained Party cannot return to their home and it also prohibits contact by telephone, e-mail and texting.

A Petition for Order of Protection is not a criminal action. However, a Restrained Party who violates the Order of Protection in any way is subject to immediate arrest. In addition, the person can be subject to both criminal charges and contempt of court . So if you are served with an Order of Protection, it is very important that you read the terms of the Order carefully and strictly obey them.

At the hearing, which should occur quickly after the filing of the Petition, the court will decide whether or not an act of domestic abuse has occurred. Depending on where you live, the hearing may be presided over by a judge, a hearing officer or a special commissioner. If the presiding official makes a finding that domestic abuse has occurred, the court will issue an extended Order of Protection for 6 months. The Order can be extended for up to a year for good cause with Motion to Extend the Order of Protection Against Domestic Violence.

A finding of domestic violence can have serious long-term implications, including prohibiting a Restrained Party from ever possessing a firearm. A finding of domestic violence can have serious immigration consequences resulting in the initiation of removal proceedings and eventual deportation of an offending immigrant. Finally, a finding of domestic violence will often bar certain types of employment and more often than not will have grave consequences for governmental security clearances.

The parties to a Petition for Order of Protection may want to consider agreeing to a Stipulated Order of Protection, which can allow them to avoid some of the consequences of a finding of domestic violence. After all, the consequences outlined above can be devastating to both the party found guilty of domestic violence as well as the alleged victim who is often left with no means of financial support for her and the children.

www.CollinsAttorneys.com

After an alleged victim (the Protected Party) of domestic violence has filed a Petition for Order of Protection and the Temporary Order of Protection has been entered preventing the alleged abuser (the Restrained Party) from any contact with the alleged victim, the court holds hearing to determine whether or not the Petition provides enough information for the court make a formal finding that domestic abuse has occurred.

These petitions are often filed in the context of a divorce or custody battle. However, they can be filed by any "household member" as defined under the statute. The Family Violence Protection Act statute defines household member as follows:

"household member" means a spouse; former spouse; family member, including a relative, parent, present or former stepparent, present or former in-law, child or co-parent of a child; or a person with whom the petitioner has had a continuing personal relationship. Cohabitation is not necessary to be deemed a household member for purposes of this section."

A parent can also file a Petition in order to protect their minor child. The court must find that a preponderance of the evidence provided at the hearing shows that an act of domestic abuse has occurred.

According to the Family Violence Protection Act, the definition of domestic abuse is very broad, but it basically defined as an incident by a household member against another household member and includes things like actual physical harm, severe emotional distress or just making a threat that causes the Protected Party reasonably think that the Restrained Party might harm them.

A finding of domestic abused can have serious implications. The court records of these civil domestic violence Petitions are not accessible to the public in New Mexico, however, all Orders of Protection are reported to the database maintained by the National Crime Information Center (NCIC), which is accessible to all law enforcement agencies in the country. A finding of domestic violence results in registry in the database as a domestic violence offender.

Registry as a domestic violence offender has numerous severe consequences. The full faith and credit clause requires that every state recognize and enforce the Orders of Protection issued by another state. Many employers, especially for jobs that require any kind of security clearance, will request that a potential employee report whether or not any findings of domestic abuse or violence have ever been made against them. And, under the federal gun control regulation, a finding of domestic abuse will prevent a Restrained Party from ever owning or possessing a firearm. This includes firearms used in hunting. It also includes firearms used in the course of law enforcement and the military effectively barring domestic violence offenders from law enforcement and military service in the absence of waivers. Finally, a finding of domestic violence serious immigration consequences including immigration removal proceedings for deportation and exclusion of the domestic violence offender from the United States.

Due to the severe consequences of a fidnign of domestic violence and the rather liberal burdens and rules of evidence in domestic violence hearings, the parties to a Petition may want to enter into a Stipulated Order of Protection, in which the Restrained Party agrees to comply with an extended Order of Protection, but a full evidentiary hearing is not held and there is no finding of domestic abuse. Both the alleged victim and the alleged abuser benefit from this arrangement particularly in cases where there are support issues. After all, it does little good to have family's provider fired from his job or worse, deported from the United States.

A party facing the a Petition for Order of Protection from Domestic Violence should discuss the implications of a finding of domestic violence and a Stipulated Order of Protection with their attorney or the court itself at the prior to the beginning of the hearing.

www.CollinsAttorneys.com

A Domestic Violence Order of Protection is a type of restraining order issued to protect victims of domestic violence and abuse, which is authorized by the Family Violence Protection Act. In New Mexico, including Albuquerque, Rio Rancho and Santa Fe, anyone can file a Petition for an Order of Protection at the Domestic Violence office on the second floor of the Second Judicial District Courthouse. It is not necessary to have an attorney to file a Domestic Violence Order of Protection.

By statute, the Court cannot charge the alleged victim (called the Protected Party) for filing the Petition and the sheriff's office cannot charge a fee for serving the alleged abuser (called the Restrained Party) with Petition and Temporary Order of Protection.

A Domestic Violence Order of Protection is separate from criminal domestic violence charges that are filed in metropolitan, magistrate or district court. In cases of criminal domestic violence actions, the police or district attorney's office will file domestic violence criminal charges based on an alleged incident of abuse in a criminal case. In a Petition for an Order of Protection from Domestic Violence is filed by the alleged or his/her attorney. ,

It is possible for criminal charges and an Order of Protection to arise from the same incident. These Petitions for Order of Protection Against Domestic Violence are often filed during a divorce proceeding or a custody dispute. Unfortunately, these petitions are often used as a weapon in a divorce or custody matter with no real basis for the petition. A party accused of an act of domestic abuse may file a response to the Petition or may also file a Counter-Petition against the party alleging the abuse.

The standard required to file a Petition is very low. Essentially, a Protected Party just has to swear to the court that they have been a victim of domestic abuse and describe the abuse in the Petition. Then the court will issue a Temporary Order of Protection, which means that the Restrained Party cannot have any contact with the Protected Party.
The Petition and Temporary Order must be personally served on the Restrained Party and the Order will set a hearing when the alleged abuser must appear before the court.

Many jurisdiction, including Albuquerque's Second Judicial District and Santa Fe's First Judicial District, have appointed designated domestic violence hearing officers or special commissioners to hold the hearings on Petitions for Orders of Protection. The hearing officer or special commissioner will hear all the evidence and issue all the findings at the hearing and then issue a report that the presiding district court judge will approve.

All testimony at these hearings is on the record and under oath. Either party may have an attorney, but unlike criminal proceedings, an attorney is not provided for you by the State. The Protected Party has the burden of showing the court by a preponderance of the evidence that an incident of domestic abuse has occurred. Preponderance of the evidence basically means that it is more likely than not that domestic abuse occurred. This is a fairly low burden unlike the burden in criminal cases. In addition, the rules of evidence and procedure can be a little lax in domestic violence hearings. It is therefore necessary to defend the actions pretty aggressively if the allegations are without merit.

Should the hearing officer find that domestic violence has occurred, an Order of Protection will be issued for a 6 month period. These Orders can be extended for an additional 6 months through the filing of a Motion to Extend Order of Protection upon a showing of good cause.

Either party may file objections to the Hearing Officer's findings and report within 10 days of the issuance of the report. The matter will then be reheard before a District Court Judge.

www.CollinsAttorneys.com

It is often said that divorce is hardest on the children, who are faced with wondering why their parents split up, possibly feeling guilty for their perceived role in that separation and often having to get used to a new place to live. In New Mexico, the term child custody is a complicated concept; it refers not only to which parent has physical possession of the child, but also which parent has the power to make to make decisions about the children's lives. Physical custody is generally described in terms of time-sharing and periods of responsibility, or visitation, all of which are most often delineated in a document called a Parenting Plan.

The law in New Mexico presumes that joint physical and legal custody is in a child's best interest because a child is better off having two parents activity involved in his or her life. However, the preference for joint custody does not mean that the baseline presumption for a Parenting Plan is that each parent has the child with them exactly fifty percent of the time.

As a preliminary matter, Parenting Plans need to be age-appropriate. For example, a fifteen-year-old may be able to handle being away from one parent for weeks at a time, whereas an infant may not. Thus, the periods of responsibility, or timesharing, will depend on the age and emotional stability of each child.

In evaluating a time-sharing schedule the Court may consider, among other things: the wishes of each parent; and the wishes of the child. In making its decision, the Court will also consider the child's relationship with each parent and any siblings; the child's ties to their school and their community; and, the mental and physical health of everyone involved in the child's life.

If the child is over the age of 14, the Court and the parents must consider his or her wishes. Although the Court does not have to agree with the child, the Court will usually defer to the child's wishes unless those wishes are manifestly harmful to the child. The plain fact is that few parents can enforce their will over a teenager, the Court most certainly cannot. The Court understands this and will not even try due to the many possible harms such forced decisions may raise.

www.CollinsAttorneys.com

Mediation is a relatively informal process in which a neutral third party facilitates communication between the parties to a divorce action or custody dispute, the goal being that the parties will resolve their issues themselves rather than having a judge decide those issues for them. A mediation is also often called a settlement facilitation and in several judicial districts around New Mexico, including the Second Judicial District in Albuquerque, there are services associated with the courts that can provide a mediation/settlement facilitation for little or no cost to the parties.

Often in a very contentious or complicated cases, the judge will order the parties to mediation/settlement facilitation in order to see if they can make some headway toward resolving their issues outside the Court. The mediation process is confidential and the rules of civil procedure prevent offers made during mediation from being used as evidence before the Court. Therefore, meditation/settlement facilitation can allow parties to freely discuss possible resolutions of their issues.

Child Custody Mediation is provided year-round at low to no cost depending on the income of the parties through the Court Clinic in Albuquerque's Second Judicial District Court. Settlement facilitation is broader in scope that child custody mediation. Settlement facilitation addresses all aspects of the divorce including the division of property and debt, the division of retirement accounts, the division of the community residence, and alimony, child support, and child custody. Divorce, custody and family law settlement facilitation is provided for free to the parties once per year during Settlement Week at the Second Judicial District Courthouse.

Parties can also arrange for their own mediation; most judicial districts around the state can provide a list of mediators in the area. The people, who act as mediators do not have to be attorneys, but they should be trained in the mediation process and, for maximum effectiveness, should also be familiar with family law issues.

The product of a successful mediation is usually a written agreement. This agreement that is often hand-written will be drafted into a Martial Settlement Agreement, which will then be submitted to the Court and incorporated in the final divorce decree. Thus, while parties do not have to be represented by counsel during the mediation process, a party should strongly consider having an attorney present because the decisions made at a mediation/settlement facilitation can have a serious impact on the property and custody rights at issue in a divorce proceeding.

www.CollinsAttorneys.com

Many of the courts throughout the State of New Mexico, including the Second Judicial District Court in Albuquerque and the Thirteenth Judicial District Court in Sandoval County, have Court Clinic Services.

Court Clinic's purpose is to help parties resolve issues of child custody, time-sharing and visitation. Court clinic does not get involved in other issues related to the divorce. In fact, Court Clinic does not even have authority to address child support.

Most cases involving child custody and time-sharing disputes will be referred to Court Clinic for a custody evaluation. The parties may choose to hire a private child custody expert (706 Expert) for purposes of a private child custody evaluation. However, these private child custody evaluation experts are extremely expensive. As a result, most cases end up in Court Clinic which provides its services on a sliding fee scale based upon the income of the parties.

Once the case is referred to Court Clinic, the case will be assigned to one of the many counselors and psychologists working in the Court Clinic. In a particularly complex case, there may be more than one Court Clinician. The Court clinician will conduct a thorough investigation of the parties, the children, third parties involved in the raising of the children including grandparents, fiancés, boyfriend/girlfriends, and even roommates living in the home.

The investigation can be quite invasive. The parties and the children, if they are old enough to participate, will undergo psychological evaluations. This process may include extensive psychological testing and interviews. In cases where third parties are involved in the upbringing of the children, those parties will be tested as well.

The investigation can take months, sometimes over a year. The time required to conduct the investigation is related to the complexity of the case as well as the huge caseload of the Court Clinicians. Once the Court Clinic has concluded its investigation, it will issue Child Custody Recommendations to the Judge. These recommendations are not binding on the judge but it is very rare that the judge does not follow the recommendations of Court Clinic.

The implications are clear. You should if at all possible work out custody and visitation with the other parent. If you cannot, then you are turning your life and the lives of your children over to a complete stranger. Though the Court Clinic process is long and relatively thorough, it remains replete with errors and mistakes due to incomplete information. Indeed, how could a complete stranger ever really know everything there is to know about you, the other parent, and your children necessary to make a perfect recommendation that is in the best interests of your children?


www.CollinsAttorneys.com

There are a variety of reasons why a couple might seek an annulment rather than a divorce, ranging from religious values to the fact that they just don't like the sound of the word divorce. The purpose of an annulment as opposed to a divorce is that an annulment renders a marriage void, as if it never happened, whereas a divorce dissolves the marriage. Unfortunately, those who seek an annulment in New Mexico are most likely going to be disappointed.

Unlike a divorce, which can be filed in New Mexico for any reason or no reason at all under the "no-fault" divorce doctrine, an annulment can be filed for only very limited reasons. In New Mexico, a marriage can only be annulled by the Court if the marriage violated one of the requirements for a valid marriage from the beginning of the marriage.

For instance if one of the spouses was not old enough to property consent to the marriage, then the marriage is invalid as a matter of law. A person must be 18 years old to consent to a marriage unless they are 16 or older and have parental consent. A person younger than 16 is only allowed to marry by an order of the New Mexico Children's Court. Likewise, a person may lack the mental capacity to consent. Other legal prohibitions making the marriage invalid from the inception are the presence of incest or bigamy.

The presence of fraud can also be a grounds for annulment. However, this typically relates back to one of the aforementioned criteria. While it is conceivable that another situation might lead the Court to grant an annulment on the basis of fraud, the grounds for an annulment are very narrow. Unfortunately, fraud does not include such grounds as "he/she said he/she was rich," or "he/she is a completley different person now that we are married." That's not fraud. It's just bad luck, bad taste or bad judgment.

www.CollinsAttorneys.com